Binary Interfaces

Interface: A collection of functions (or methods)

 

In windows binaries are used to interface programs
written in different languages to create instances of a server program as
requested by a client program.

Binary interfaces, the universal translators that make
possible the accumulation of knowledge and rise of consciousness.
Consciousness, the CPU equivalent that handles binaries. Binaries extend
from the norm presented in computing; from 128-bit to 256-bit, to 512-bit,
to 1024-bit and so on.

What is known now is only but fragments collated, as
the world weaves in a tightly bound matrix. Matrix presents the arena where
nature’s events unravel. Kaufman’s POCE’s, the bits the binaries consist
off. Fresh out of the dive in the quantum world the organized bits of
information, the essence of the universe at its basic level, in Kaufmanns
universal matrix, in computing with its interfaces that makes it possible
for program processes to communicate with one another to connect despite
being written in different languages. All these fragments must be put
together as they are all part of a universal underlying truth that waits to
be revealed in a form of revelation.

The mind knows but it does not tell. Everything that
surrounds us is brought into awareness via binary interfaces and
consciousness is able to decipher and use them. Complexity is arising by
means of these interfaces. Binaries which make it possible for the
relational matrix to advance from level to level higher and higher.
Consciousness uses these binaries to bring into existence all these floating
bits and zeros around us, enveloping them with skin amassing them with
substance.

 


Tessellated patterns

 

Tessellations and congruent interfaces
We recognize, react, act upon patterns. These patterns make
up interfaces, their patterned form is presented as a stimulus. Stimuli,
several stimuli emanate, are deduced, are included in a particular pattern.
In the same way that a certain pattern of shapes can be presented in several
ways by a group of pupils (different flavors). 


A pattern of shapes, can easily be a pattern of signals.
That pattern can be broken down to the basic units of matter, quanta. Can
have a digital nature or more inclusive can contain information, organised
in patterns and in doing so it conveys different chunks of information.
Digital, ones and zeros, it is a way only to convey information. Information
can be transferred in other ways too, in analogue.

How can
this be imaged in quantum terms? 

Is, a
pattern of quanta formed, a way to convey information? 
        

Any pattern, presented to the human brain, is a pattern of
quanta and can contain information.

But is the kind of information that the human brain can
analyse and make use of?

That will depend upon the human machinery, machine, the
mechanisms it uses to make sense out of a given pattern, the hardware and
the software as well.

And these mechanisms are neuron
firings, neurons specialised as far down as neurons firing in response to
straight lines, particular colours, direction, a particular smell. This can
only be a small part of a given pattern. A pattern is bigger, can fill our
visual field. A neuron acts as part of a group and that group is used to
make up a bigger part of a pattern but still not all. A bigger group, a
supergroup needs to be used to include an even bigger part of the pattern
but still not all. Finally the whole of the brain needs to be used to
include the full pattern in front of us. That denies any further breakdown
down to quanta as being significant for the rise of awareness. We do not
have special detecting sensors to be triggered by quantum changes. Quanta
might make up the patterns we analyse and the brain which we use to analyse
the patterns but other than that quanta do not seem to be involved in the
processes and the processee. 

We exist in the froth, as it has been described, oblivious
to what is underlying the froth, floating and we analyse the froth, in the
classical world. Of course both objects and object observing machine exist
because of quantum interactions. Quantum changes affect or should affect
both or we are not aware of this since our object detecting mechanisms
detect only changes in the froth. We are ignorant, unable to observe
underlying changes responsible for the existence of the forth. And there
comes knowledge to tell you that there is a lot underlying the froth. 

You start imagining how things are, then start finding
connections of the quantum world and the froth through which you can detect
the world you can not see through the world you can see. That is possible
since the classical world is made from the quantum world so there should be
something left over from all the bursting bubbles that make up the froth on
to the froth for us to see either directly or indirectly with the use of
tools. 

 

Assembled quanta

 

It may all lie in the need to interact, to assemble, to create
new structures arranged in levels, following up the guiding principle that the whole is more
than the sum of its parts and as such is different from its parts and the laws that
govern them. Once assembled its compelled to find new rules, new laws to
interact in its present assembled structure with the other similarly assembled
structures
residing in the same level in ways unreminiscent of its past, oblivious of its
origin. Though these laws, novel and different from the laws of the structures
derived from, are yet affected by the laws that underlie them, but in ways hidden
to the level above.

There
must be some sort of feedback, positive and/or negative, depending on
the situation, which governs the relationships of the components from
level to level. If certain factors are at critical points increase the
effects of a specific relationship (positive feedback) or if certain
factors increase at critical points decrease the effects of a certain
relationship (negative feedback). This can be effected (bi-directional)
both ways up-down and down-up the level. From the whole to the parts
and form the parts to the whole. Needless to say that these changes
will have further changes imposed, as the arrangements and the
interactions emanating from these arrangements will change. Mathematics
should be able to find the laws governing such a behaviour and able to
find formulae to express such changes. The mathematics pertaining the
ascension in the hierarchical levels. Formulae to describe the
relationship of the whole to its parts, detect, analyse, and describe
emergence.

 

Mathematical analysis of feedback mechanisms

 

Feedback as playing a role in the interpretation of patterns
by the human brain. 

 

Binary nature of interfaces.

 

The "bits" that make an interface are not the same
in all
systems. As the systems are organised at different hierarchical levels with components that
are part of other systems or they are systems on their own sake the binary nature of
each system changes.

A "bit" of a higher level system is composite
made up from the lower level "bits" of the systems included in it.
In turn each of the included lower level systems are comprised by
"bits" that are composed by their specific lower level system
"bits" and this relationship continues right down to the quantum
level. Each "bit" at each level is a special organisation of the
quantum load (the number of quantum entities) they carry. As you go up the
steps in the hierarchical ladder the quantum load increases exponentially. The
organisation of the quantum entities of a "bit" at each level
confers the component of that level its specific properties (environment or
system variables) appropriate to the level they reside. These properties
manifest themselves spontaneously pre-determined as a result of the specific
level organisation required with the included quantum entities destined to act
, behave as a unit, the component. The randomness of the quantum world
enslaved, ensnared in restrictive systems of low entropy. 

However the carrying "bits" of each system in any
level in the hierarchical ladder do not stop to "feel" the impact of
their random nature. No matter whether they are locked and destined to act as
a unit the interactions within the unit and with other units and their
carrying quantum entities continues. Though they are bound to act as a unit
due to the constraints carried by the specific level organisation required
they express their impact of their continuously changing dynamic nature in
ways appropriate and within the boundaries of the carrying system but ways
that are challenging and testing for the system forcing to extend its
boundaries. They carry with them a boundary extending potential. 

The boundary extending potential is more profound at the
higher hierarchical levels where the quantum load is greater and the potential
combinations endless.

In the social space
in a classroom in a group of people for example the anger state of each member
of a group makes up the binary interface which can be called by pointers to
create an instance of a program, an object, a moment of existence. 

 

Pseudo-objects and the creation of reality

 

In the organisation of pseudo-objects that interact between
themselves and create instances of existence that form patterns made up
fleetingly. As new interactions continue to replace the fading ones and doing
faster than they vanish the pattern (or its majority) continues to exist and
that is what we experience (New Scientist, 26 February 2000, pp.26-28).
The interaction between the pseudo-objects can be entanglement. Virtual
particles and their potential of becoming real particles when they interact
with other real particles might be a way to change the nature of the
arrangements and thus of the interface.

 

The human level

 

At the human level the interfaces appear as patterns, neuron
firing patterns conveyed by our senses, the client part, forming
binaries with the firing patterns potentially can be created by other means
beyond the senses or from senses which are not specific for a particular
interface. Each interface carries the methods which instantiate the objects
the behaviour patterns the actions etc, the server part.

Examples of interfaces being:

  • a face

  • a smile

  • a situation 

  • sounds

  • scenery                                          

Building up an arsenal of interfaces as we gather
experiences. The client programs being images, sounds, sentences, words,
touch contact which directly stimulate neurons and induce a firing pattern.
Neuron firing has a binary nature. The firing pattern propagates and
stimulates other areas o the brain. The binary nature of the interfaces is
comprised by individuals, persons, components, units.

There can be interfaces comprised by processes non-tangible
arrangements of procedures, events, yes or no states, one or zero states.
Group of events provide, present a pattern, provide the binaries forms the
interface. The interface carries methods functions. Methods instantiate
instances, moments of existence, objects.

We can define the process space where the "processes"
are. It is virtual? The space defined as the place a process unfolds, unravels
its events, where its components reside, act, move. Process or system space is
where a process take place.

A system is made up of  components and process space.
Relationships exist between the components of a system and the components and
the process space. The relationships are defined by the (environment)
variables. The variables can be system , local, global. A process involves
interactions between the components and components and the space they reside.

Systems are building up complexity and they are in hierarchical
levels. Each level is built as a system. Systems in different hierarchical
levels communicate with each other by interfaces.

Let us accept that interfaces exist between systems in a hierarchical
structure. Each system can be thought of comprised by units that talk another
language having another alphabet.

 

Components

 

The structure and quality of components. The components,
making up the bits
and zeros our interfaces recognise, are composite. Individuals the
object-subjects and other objects that request placement in our reality
canvases, appear to us as  components, either in a bit or a zero state,
as it is expressed in the hierarchical emergence level we acknowledge their
existence. The components existence – object-subjects and objects alike – and
their associated state, bit or zero, is a result of emergence through the
preceding hierarchical levels as they follow the commands of  the
programs prevalent in each respective hierarchical level. The rules of
emergence dictate that at each hierarchical level, the whole is more than the
sum of its parts, therefore acquiring attributes that are distinct from the
attributes pertained in the parts they are made of, the parts they are
composed from. Emergence is holistic in nature.

This holds true for each preceding hierarchical level, as the
parts in each level assemble to make up a whole.  –  level  of a
wider system, a higher level system. Components should be defined in ways that
make them universally applicable, as well as the definitions of the interfaces,
relationships, transfer and variables.

 
The object being a behavior pattern a particular state,
actions, events unfolding in the theater the stage (arena) provided by the carrying
space (terrain).

Bubbles contain components 

 

Interface call-up

 

Methods, like buttons you press, call up an interface. The interface,
in its turn, calls methods functions that determine how a person reacts, acts
upon a certain situation, behaves.

Methods or functions can be hardwired, learned, inherited.
They are dictated by the environment, the environment variables. The client
(the mind) calls the interfaces (neuron firing patterns).

Interfaces reside in memory and are called by pointers to
their memory location. Pointers are triggered by the methods, the pressed
buttons. They follow up threads; paths taken, which they carry the pointers. Threads,
in their turn, switch on and off; they are specific to pointers and interfaces
alike. Threads provide the context and are influenced by it. Once a thread is
active it will only access and therefore pass pointers to the relevant
interfaces and no other. Interfaces, which do not make up part of a thread’s
repertoire, can not be accessed. The currently used thread must be switched off, to
allow another thread to switch on and carry the pointer to the  memory
location of the new interface.

 

Dream of revelation

 

What woke me up at such an hour wanted to come out and reveal
itself, it was a process in need of clarification. The tree rebelled, as it could
not take any more, assumed anthropomorphic qualities, uprooted itself to
assert control in its overcrowded patch of space by its suffocating offspring siblings,
establish its
status and create a new form of existence by means of an interface, an interface
apparently hidden but which can be known and once known can be used to create
instances of existence.

And
the entity that followed and guided me to the way I could find out
where the interface lied and in a windows-like folder search bring the
interface out to a computing-like environment, an environment variable
which once introduced it could provide the means of connection and
provide instances of a program; a process similar to a server program
instances (create and destroy objects) as they are brought out by the
client program.

So we can assume an equivalency of the computing idea of an
environment with its resident programs and its floating variables with the
idea of the environment, the contents and the space (surrounding) it is
included in; the relational matrix as
similar with resident programs and floating variables which if provided with
the specific interfaces will bring out existence.

Instances of existence instantiated in server-client
manner. The client being awareness and the server being consciousness.

The
interfaces lurking in the wider environment, as it is the
existence-expression of consciousness, including us as an integral part
awaiting to be called up by client programs built-in deep in our mind;
brain patterns, sequences of firing (process) neurons (structure);
triggered by pointers aiming at their location in memory, receptors
transducers able to receive waves like the advanced and retarded
Feynman waves which resemble the processes the resident programs or the
way that permeate and propagate in the wider surroundings and our minds
with the transducer chip-like structures which their essence as yet
elusive incomprehensible; the nature of which still puzzles people
unexplained such as the reason why in cloning the egg ovum decide
whether to allow stem cells to develop into their relevant tissue or
not, which it would depend on factors residing in the deeper more
essential basic level of information depending on the bits and zeros
the quantum world requires to build interfaces, up and to eventually
bring about complexity, in an upward spiraling level-like organisation
giving rise to phenomena tangible to our senses at the higher levels.

 

Time and space attributes of interfaces

 

This is not the first time I have observed this coincidence or
deja-vous which is a pattern in itself or put it clearly a pattern that
extends in space and time and more in the time constituent which it comes as a natural
consequence of an emerging pattern. The actions which somehow generate, create
a pattern which its parts are lying there in front of you, either being
placed unconsciously in the past by your own acts or by walking over to where
they are or have been placed. Time, past or future and space work in a determined
way, a way that fits a certain pattern. Once you have entered the landscape of
a pattern the rest of the pattern will unfold naturally in front of you.

Several examples spring into my mind in support of this claim
as with the consistency of attitudes, the result of hardwired brain reflex
actions brought about by the constant feedback fashion interaction with the
world at large, which when followed bring
the desired or sought after outcomes. This is what makes me think if it is
bearing any kind of relation to the fact that we live in the froth but the
froth and its constituent quanta, determine the way we act, despite the fact
that
our brain seemingly is made up only to observe, respond and detect macroscopic
changes of
the froth. 

This entry was posted in thoughts. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment